logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원(청주) 2020.01.14 2019나2224
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants and Defendant E’s request for return of provisional payment are dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where dismissal or additional decision is rendered as follows, and thus, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. Parts to be removed or added;

A. The main part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: “Mis not administered by Ethical 16,17” in the 12th part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: “Mis not equipped with Ethical fluorine, which is not administered by the first-aid vehicle.”

The 13th part of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as "written submission by the deceased") shall be deemed to be "written".

The 15th instance judgment of the first instance court stated, “The Defendant does not keep the Ephere in the emergency vehicle of the Defendant hospital” as “the head of a medical institution that jointly operates the Defendant hospital, which is a medical institution, and does not keep the Ephere in the emergency vehicle.”

B. The following reasons are added between the 6th judgment of the first instance and the 20th judgment.

On November 20, 2019, the Defendant: “In the case of this proposal, the possibility of the citizens’ response due to the omission component is low. In the case of the Deceased, the Defendant’s response to the fact-finding by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation and Investigation of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation and Investigation, which includes the fact that the high level of heart cryposis is confirmed, rapid progress is shown, and the death leads to the death, shall be considered of the possibility of acute heart funerals, including the acute heart cryp color.” On November 20, 2019, the response to the fact-finding by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation and Investigation of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation and Investigation was the P of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation and Investigation, which is considered below, and the fact-finding by the first instance trial. It is sufficient to view the Deceased to have died from the heart disease, and therefore, it cannot be deemed that the fact-finding inquiry was the death of the excessive shock. However, the above fact-finding inquiry was made by the same person.

arrow