A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 2016, the Defendant 50,000 won in cash on the part of the victim’s wallet, using the crepans inside the mutual infesturies where the victim B carried a bath to show shower in the trade in the hand-on hand-on box of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

As a result, the theft was committed.

2. On May 2016, the Defendant: (a) taken out KRW 100,00 in cash from the mutual influoral telecom, which is in the transfer dong of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, in cash, in a manner described above;

As a result, the theft was committed.

3. On June 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) took 30,000 won in cash from the mutual influences, which are engaged in the police campaign at Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) around 07:00,000.

As a result, the theft was committed.

4. The Defendant, on June 2016, removed KRW 50,000 in cash from the mutual influoral telecom that is engaged in the police campaign at Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, in cash by the said method.

As a result, the theft was committed.

5. On July 28, 2016, the Defendant attempted to steals cash from the mutual influence, which is a trade name and influence movement in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, by the foregoing method, but did not commit an attempted crime, even though the Defendant was aware of the fact that it was committed by the victim.

6. The Defendant, on August 8, 2016, removed KRW 50,000 in cash from the mutual influoral telecom, which is engaged in the police campaign at Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, at around KRW 07:0.

As a result, the theft was committed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the detailed Acts and subordinate statutes on card transactions;

1. Relevant Articles 329 of the Criminal Act and Articles 329 (section 1), 342, and 329 of the Criminal Act are limited to “Article 329 of the Criminal Act” in the column of the applicable law of the indictment under Article 329 of the Criminal Act. However, in light of the facts charged, this appears to be a clerical error in “Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act”.

(the attempted charge of larceny). Selection of each fine

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order.