beta
Text
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
Reasons
1. Summary of the facts charged
(a) No person shall engage in any business activity disturbing public morals, such as having juveniles lodge together on September 3, 2015, by committing any crime with new walls, on the grounds that he/she is allowed to stay together with male and female juveniles;
Nevertheless, on September 3, 2015, the Defendant provided guest rooms to E (n, 22 years of age) and juvenile F (n, 18 years of age), G (n, 18 years of age), and H (n, 13 years of age) in the “Durel” operated by the Defendant in Heak-gu, Seo-gu, Goju-gu, Cheongju-si.
(b) On September 3, 2015, no one shall engage in any business which disturbs public morals by allowing male and female juveniles to sleep together with other male and female juveniles.
Nevertheless, on September 3, 2015, the Defendant provided E (n, 22 years of age) and juvenile F (n, 18 years of age), G (n, 18 years of age), and H (n, 13 years of age) with the “Del” operated by the Defendant in Heak-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongdong-gu. In addition, the Defendant provided 303 years of age with the said Tur.
2. Some statements in E, F, and G investigative agencies (F and G are not previously known to the Defendant, but at the time when about seven months have elapsed since the occurrence of the case, the Defendant’s photograph was presented and made a statement to confirm the offender) which appear to be consistent with the fact that the Defendant had sent a guest room so that the Defendant would have been able to become familiar with the male and female juveniles at the time of judgment. In light of their legal statements, it is difficult to believe that it is difficult to prove it as it is, and there is no other evidence to prove it (excluding the probability that the Defendant would have sent a guest room to the juveniles employed by the Defendant at the time). 3. In conclusion, the facts charged constitute a case where there is no evidence of a crime, and thus, a verdict of innocence is pronounced in accordance with the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment of innocence under Article 58 of the Criminal Act is