A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) changed the destination immediately after the victim C’s boarding a DNF rocketing cab operated by the victim C (40) and refused to demand the victim to leave the vehicle from the victim after having changed the destination.

Accordingly, the defendant was faced with the defect that the injured person intends to catch and dupe the defendant's breath, and the defendant was pushed the injured person above the sibs, and the face of the injured person attached to the defendant who tried to escape from the site after drinking the victim's face, and caused about seven days of treatment.

2. The Defendant damaged property by putting the victim at the same time and at the same time at the same place as indicated in paragraph 1, it refers to “a defect recording” that the victim tried to report to 112, and by cutting the cell phone owned by the victim from the cell phone, thereby damaging the market value so that the amount of the cell phone can be repaired.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement in each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. Description of the written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of each of the visual Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged side photographs and mobile phone photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. An order to attend a lecture and an order to attend a community service order to recommend the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The scope of the final sentence according to the increase of multiple crimes in cases where the scope of the punishment for Class 1 (Assaults) in the mitigated area (including February to one year), the punishment for not having been imposed (including serious efforts to recover damage), or considerable partial damage has been recovered, the scope of the punishment for Class 1 (damages, etc.) in the mitigated area (one month to six months) in the mitigated area (including property damage, etc.) (one month to six months) (including a special mitigated person), the punishment for not having been imposed (including a serious effort to recover damage), or the damage has been considerably recovered, the scope of the final sentence according to the increase of multiple crimes: the defendant is related to violence in two months to March 13.