(영문) 광주고등법원(제주) 2013.10.02 2013나463

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주고등법원(제주) 2013.10.02 2013나463

부당이득금반환

Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. The total cost of the lawsuit is resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning the facts, relevant statutes, and the parties’ arguments are as follows, and as such, the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the entry of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

The judgment of the court of first instance that “the ownership of each piece of land recorded” in the 11-12th part of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified to read “the ownership of each piece of land before the annexation was made” and “the Building Act of the 16th and the 3rd side” was amended by Act No. 10755, May 30, 201.

(a) The same shall apply;

(1) On the 3rd day of the judgment of the first instance court, the phrase “Nos. 1 through 16” in the first instance court, which is amended to read “Nos. 1 through 16,” and “Nos. 35 (Report on Diversion of Farmland)” in the 16th day of the judgment of the first instance court, which is amended to read “Nos. 1 through 16 (including the number of branches where there are serial numbers)” are as follows: 1. Cooperatives refer to regional associations and product associations; 2. Regional associations refer to regional agricultural cooperatives and regional livestock cooperatives established pursuant to this Act; 12th day of the same, “The Farmland Act (amended by Act No. 11171 of Jan. 17, 2012)” shall be amended to read “The Farmland Act,” and “No. 35 (Report on Diversion of Farmland)” in the 16th day shall be amended to read “No. 136(1)17, 2012,” and “No. 13636(3) of the previous farmland preservation Act” (amended.

2. Determination:

A. The history of the relevant statutory provisions and the source of the “farmland preservation charges” system and the system of exemption from charges under the Agricultural Cooperatives Act are as follows:

1) After having been enacted by Act No. 2373 on December 18, 1972, the farmland preservation and utilization Act had a person who diverts farmland pay expenses incurred in the creation of farmland.

참조조문

-건축법

-농지법

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-광주고등법원 제주재판부 2013.10.2. 선고 2013나463 판결

-서울고등법원 2010. 3. 18. 선고 2009누22890 판결

-대구지방법원포항지원 2013.11.01 2013가합1452

-청주지방법원충주지원 2013.08.22 2013가합669

-광주고등법원 (전주) 2017.04.27 2015나102274