logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2015.11.13 2014가단7249
공유물분할
Text

1.(a)

Attached Form

Real estate stated in paragraph (1) in the list of real estate shall be put to an auction and auction costs shall be incurred from the sale price.

Reasons

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the claim for partition of co-owned property: (a) the Plaintiff and the Defendants shared the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table Nos. 1 of the co-ownership share ratio; (b) the real estate listed in paragraphs (2) through (12) of the attached Table No. 2 of the attached Table No. 1 of the co-ownership share share ratio; (c) the fact that the Plaintiff and the Defendants shared each share ratio listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 2 of the attached Table No. 2 of the co-ownership share (hereinafter “instant land”); (d) the Plaintiff and the Defendants did not reach agreement on

2. In full view of the circumstances, such as the location and size of the land of this case, the relation of share, the provisional attachment and seizure registration as to the co-ownership shares of Defendant B among the land of this case, and the registration of provisional attachment registration as to the co-ownership shares of Defendant H, and the registration of provisional attachment registration as to the co-ownership shares of Defendant C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, and present the progress of consultation with the Plaintiff that was progress in around 2011, and present a written response that it is not impossible for the Defendants to reach an agreement on division. However, in full view of the following circumstances, it is difficult or inappropriate to divide the land of this case, without complying with the order of the court to present specific subdivision that the Defendants desired, and without complying with the order of the second court to present the detailed subdivision plan that the Defendants want, the Defendants did not attend the court after the date of preparatory pleading.

Therefore, the land of this case is sold by auction and the remainder after subtracting the auction cost from the price is divided by means of sharing shares between the plaintiff and the defendants.

arrow