A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 19, 2014, the Defendant causing property damage: (a) did not calculate ice cream within the “C convenience store” located in Chungcheongnam-gun B located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (b) stated that the victim D, an employee of the said convenience store, expressed a defect in calculating the said cream; and (c) damaged the market value of beverages, instant instant beverages, coffee, sugar, alcoholic beverages, etc., which were displayed for sale within the convenience store by placing them on the floor and destroying them.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time and place indicated in the preceding paragraph, 112 reported the disturbance as above, was removed from F of the situation where the voice police station Emba, sent out after being 112 reported, and boomed the ebbbbbbb of the above ebbbbbbbb, and prevented him from taking the ebbbbb of the above ebs.g., the Defendant told the above ebs of the above slope G, stating that “I ebal flick, I nb, I have to go to go to the eb of the above slope.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the receipt and handling of 112 reports by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (on-site photographs and attaching victim D standing photographs);

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act: The defendant committed the crime of this case even though he/she could have had the same criminal history, and the ordinary circumstances where the ordinary public authority such as this case is related to the safety of the general public and thus requires punishment corresponding thereto: the defendant's crime is committed, the damage to property is being committed, the victim of the damage to property has agreed smoothly with the defendant.