1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,608,00 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from July 3, 2015 to November 19, 2015.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 3 and Eul evidence 4:

The Plaintiff is an individual entrepreneur engaged in the parts manufacturing business in the trade name of “C,” and the Defendant is an individual entrepreneur engaged in the mechanical parts manufacturing business in the trade name of “D.”

B. On May 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to supply CN7 car learning machine parts in total to KRW 29,108,000 (hereinafter “instant commodity supply contract”).

C. The Plaintiff supplied machinery parts to the Defendant by July 2014 in accordance with the instant goods supply contract. The Defendant supplied the machinery parts to the Defendant on May 15, 2014, and the same year to the Plaintiff.

6. November 3, 11, 200,000 won; KRW 5,00,000,000 for the same month; and KRW 18,50,000 for the total amount of KRW 50,000 on July 17, 2014.

2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff 10,608,000 won for the remainder of the goods under the contract for the supply of the goods in this case and damages for delay.

The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant should pay to the Plaintiff KRW 10,710,000 in addition to the goods supply contract of this case, including the additional processing of parts and the subsequent processing costs. However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that there was an agreement on the payment of additional parts as alleged by the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to support this otherwise.

The plaintiff's assertion on this part is without merit.

3. As to the judgment on the defendant's defense, the defendant asserts that since there are defects in the parts supplied by the plaintiff to the defendant and damage equivalent to the total of KRW 18,129,00 has occurred, the amount of goods should be reduced from the above amount. However, each of the items in the evidence Nos. 6 through 11 is that the defendant asserts in the parts supplied by the plaintiff.