The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The Prosecutor’s appeal-based summary of the reasoning of the appeal is unreasonable because the sentence (2 million won in penalty, and completion of sexual assault treatment programs for 24 hours) declared by the lower court is too uneasible.

2. The crime of this case committed the crime of this case that the victim did not have a significant mental impulse and body, and the defendant spreads images to the parties to the b body images.

The fact that there is a record of punishment of a fine due to the crime committed by intimidation is disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, in full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, including Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment appears to be within a reasonable and appropriate scope, and it cannot be deemed unfair because it seems unfair because it appears that the lower court’s punishment is reasonable and appropriate, and is too unreasonable, in light of all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., and thus, it cannot be deemed unfair.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.