logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.05 2015나36371
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is written as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

With regard to the evidence admitted by the evidence mentioned above of the third 11th of the judgment of the first instance, the said evidence shall be admitted by adding the entry of the evidence under subparagraph 5 and the whole purport of the pleading.

In the end of the fourth 9th decision of the first instance court (the plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff's vehicle entered the second two-lanes before the right of way, but according to the result of analysis of CCTV images, at the time when the defendant's vehicle completed the two-lane entry, the plaintiff's vehicle was at least 131 meters later, so the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit).

2. The decision of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow