The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Although the Defendant did not steals the victim’s money at the time of the instant case, the lower court erred by misapprehending the fact and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

The sentence of unfair sentencing (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The lower court consistently affirmed the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, ① the victim was aware of the fact that he was unable to use the money in his toilet for a short period of 10 won or more, and ② the Defendant did not make a statement to the extent that he was unable to make a false statement, on the ground that he was able to make a false statement to the extent that she was able to do so, she had no choice but to say that she had no choice but to she had no choice but to she had no choice but to she. she had no choice but to she had no choice but to she had no choice but to her own no choice but to she had no choice but to her own no choice but to she had no choice but to she had no choice but to her statement to the extent that she had no choice but to she had no choice but to she made a false statement.