Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 75,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

While the Defendant was in need of KRW 2 million for the settlement of credit card payments, the Defendant proposed that he/she would receive loans from a financial company by pretending that he/she would purchase a heavy vehicle from C (personal matters), and that he/she would receive loans from the financial company. On April 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) provided C at a restaurant near the Mmcccadong located in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu; (b) provided the “D” workplace; (c) provided “D” in the “Agreement on the Settlement of Social Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) and “Special High and High and High/Loan Agreements”; and (d) stated that he/she applied for loans 20 million to “C” as security; and (e) provided a written application and written agreement to “C” for loans for the victim.

However, in fact, it was thought that cash was prepared through the second and second installment loan, and in fact, it was not required to purchase the second and second class. At the time, it was not working in D, and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan because it did not have any particular income or property.

The Defendant received 20 million won from the damaged party to the (G) bank account (G) bank account designated by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as an application for a heavy loan, an agreement on a heavy loan, a copy of passbook, and a copy of resident registration certificate;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Selection of a fine in consideration of the fact that the amount of damage does not exceed the amount of damage, the fact that there is no power to commit the same kind of crime, etc.);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.