A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2018, the Defendant received a request from the victim from the victim from September 2018 to the victim for “a request from the victim to return 200 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % from the victim’s 200 200 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 200 00 20 00 00 200 20 00 00 20 00 200 00 00 200 00 20 00 200 00 00 200 00 00 00

The Defendant received the above 200 interest rates from the above D pursuant to the agreement with the victim, and returned them again to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant accepted the proposal to the effect that the above 200 interest rates were preferentially used as debt repayment to other investors in a place where it is not known around December 2018, in violation of the above duties.

As a result, the Defendant violated his duties, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to 200 E.S. E. 200 E. 16 million won at the market price) and causing property damage equivalent to the same amount to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement about witness D and B;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of the Kakao Kakao Stockholm dialogue between A and D, e-mail details, Kakao Stockholm dialogue details, refund details, etc. to the suspect A to the suspect D on a separate case F, and application of the Kakao Kakao Stockholm statutes among the suspects related to investment as one of the Fcos.

1. Relevant Article 355 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows.