Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a pastor of the “D church” in South-gu, South-gu, East-gu, under the jurisdiction of the Defendant, who works for the “E” from the “E” of the NAVD to “F.”

On April 29, 2017, at around 22:03, the Defendant visited the Defendant’s cell phone with the Defendant’s cell phone in the above-mentioned D church log, and thereby preventing the Defendant from winning the G party candidate of the 19th presidential election.

I explained that I would like to play in the way that I would like to call for the resignation of H candidates before the G political party office and call for the unification into I and return to I;

According to the galle survey, there was a big change from 28 days after the 28th day of fish farming to the H5% of the public opinion poll, and there was a lot of change that the large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale large-scale medium-scale medium-scale

The rate of 20 per week is 20 per cent of the People's Republic of Korea,

This is also the purely political party of the military, I, one of which is leading to the first place in the territory of the Republic of Korea, has the honor to record the NAN North Korea.

It is clear that there will be a sense that H's support rate is high in the future, and that there will be a great error that Korea will move into a panion;

I, as such, 34 per cent of the A.I.D. support rate:

Compared with the I candidate's 29th anniversary of trust, the 29th anniversary of trust and the Gangnam H U.S., the I candidate's 29th anniversary of trust.

Malithy is not harsh to sugar.

“.......”

However, in fact, Korean galle did not publish that I candidate support rate of 20% or 5% or that H candidate support rate was 20%. Rather, according to the candidate support rate implemented in Korea galle in April 27, 2017, I candidate was 1%, and H candidate was 12%, and the above notice was false.

Accordingly, the Defendant published false facts about H candidates so that H candidates can be disadvantageous to H candidates using the SNS communications media, which is a SNS communications media, with a view to preventing H candidates from being elected.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court;