A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 4, 2018, at around 17:05, the Defendant stated that “The police officer may intervene in the matters hedging between men and women” to the police officer at the police station C of Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station who called up after receiving a report from the Defendant on 112 that “at the place of residence of the Defendant, there is a dispute about drinking, such as female-child” from the Defendant. However, the above police officer cannot intervene in the police officer’s “the matters hedging between men and women.”

For the reason that the police officer did not enter this, he thought that he was “Ieman,” and instead, he saw him as “Ie the police officer’s franch,” and snicked the franchis of the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, under the grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances:

- The nature of the crime of this case does not correspond to those of the defendant, provided that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine for the last ten years. - The defendant is against his mistake.