logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2006. 11. 29. 선고 2006두15851 판결
사실과 다른 세금계산서의 실물거래여부 (심리 볼속행 판결)[국승]
Title

Whether or not a actual transaction of a tax invoice different from the fact is made (Decision of Presiding Trial)

Summary

It is just that there is no objective evidence to prove that the real transaction was a real transaction, and it is not illegal to dispose of the bonus after inclusion of the amount including value added tax in the calculation of earnings.

Related statutes

Article 67 of the Corporate Tax Act

Article 19 (Scope of Deductible Expenses)

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff

Reasons

The appeal shall be dismissed in accordance with Article 429 of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 5 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal since the appellant did not state the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal and did not submit a statement of grounds for appeal within the prescribed period. It is so decided as per

arrow