1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

On February 27, 2017, the Plaintiff driven a vehicle and driven in the direction of the luminous distance from the Seogra on February 27, 2017, while driving the vehicle in the direction of the luminous distance, the Plaintiff did not look at the surrounding area and did not pose a risk, and the Defendant, a traffic police driver, controlled the traffic police driver to impose penalty and penalty points. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s obligation to compensate for the damages is asserted to the purport that the Defendant is obligated to do so.

However, the materials submitted by the Plaintiff alone are insufficient to recognize that the Defendant committed a tort against the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance that dismissed the plaintiff's claim is legitimate, and thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.