logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2019.04.17 2019가단434
분양대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the cause of the instant claim, and 2014

7. Around September, 2014, the Defendant received a contract for the installation of a scrink and a scrink for Pyeongtaek-si building from the Defendant, and completed the said construction on or around August 20, 2014, and the Defendant, instead of payment, provided the Plaintiff as payment in kind of C building D equivalent to KRW 100 million, but the Defendant sold the said No. D to Nonparty E, and the Plaintiff did not pay the remainder of KRW 50,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

2. However, the Plaintiff was awarded the above construction contract by the Defendant and received the above sub-paragraph D as payment in kind.

There is no evidence to prove that the Defendant paid the above construction cost to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit, without examining the remainder of the claim.

(A) According to the Plaintiff’s evidence, the Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow