Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates the 'Dart' in Socheon-gu, Socheon-si C;

1. On October 17, 2012, around 17:30 on October 17, 2012, selling Madsing tobacco, which is drugs harmful to juveniles, to juveniles E (the age of 17) at the Madsing;

2. Around October 17, 2012, at the Madste, sold tobacco with a Madste amp, which is a drug harmful to juveniles, to juvenile F (the age of 17).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each testimony of witness E and F;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. The prosecutor stated the pertinent legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 51 subparag. 8 and 26(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act’s selective punishment, as “Article 58 subparag. 3 and Article 28(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act” in the column for applicable provisions of indictment.

The applicable provisions in the Juvenile Protection Act (Act No. 11229) are not applicable to the current Juvenile Protection Act (Act No. 11229). It appears that it is clear that it is an entry by mistake, and even if the entry by mistake is corrected, it does not affect the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense. Thus

Selection of Fines

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. 가납명령 형사소송법 제334조 제1항 피고인 및 변호인의 주장에 대한 판단 피고인 및 변호인은 청소년들에게 담배를 판 사실이 없다고 주장하나, E, F은 이 법정 및 수사기관에서 ‘피고인으로부터 담배를 샀다’는 취지로 각 진술하고 있는바, 위 각 진술 내용이 매우 구체적이고 일관되며 특히 객관적 합리성을 결여하였다고 보이는 부분도 발견되지 아니하는 점 및 E, F의 이 법정에서의 증언태도 등을 종합하여 보면, E, F의 위 각 진술은 전체적으로 신빙할 수 있다고 보이므로, 피고인 및 변호인의 위 주장은 받아들이지 아니한다.