logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.08.24 2016고단2821
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant was the former male-child of the victim B, and the victim C is the mother of the above victim B.

1. On August 23, 2015, the Defendant connected the Internet d and 403, which is an Internet d and flabing site, using the black PC, and then, in order to slander the victim B as if the victim B wishes to have sexual intercourse with many and unspecified people, the Defendant attached a photograph of the victim’s Kakakao Stockholm propy by capturing the victim’s Kakao Stockholm, as the victim posted his writing, and attached a photograph to “I want to enjoy the victim’s flabing of a flabing Stockholm.”

The author posted a letter "The Telecommunication Liquor Tax," which can be adjusted to indicate that the victim is a woman who wants to have sexual intercourse with many and unspecified persons.

However, the defendant did not obtain the consent of the victim of the above writing, and the victim was not a woman who wants to have sexual intercourse with many and unspecified persons.

Accordingly, with a view to slandering the victim, the Defendant posted any false information in public on the website through which many unspecified people can access via an information and communications network, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation, as well as impairing the victim’s reputation by disclosing any false information via an information and communications network from August 21, 2015 to October 12, 2015.

2. On August 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 01:08, the victim C, the mother of the above B, using the Internet Kakakao Stockholm Stockholm.

Therefore, it is necessary to do so.

It was wrong because he/she went to go on to go on, and she was wrong.

We need to see.

In addition to sending the message “,” from August 21, 2015 to October 30, 2015, the message and image sent from August 21, 2015 to October 21, 2015, sent to the victim six times repeatedly uneasiness, i.e., attached Table 2 of the sight of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.With respect to B and C, respectively.

arrow