logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.24 2019나73538
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. The circumstances leading up to the instant accident are as follows.

At the time of the accident, the plaintiff's insured vehicle C (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff's vehicle") D (including the time when the driver is named, including the time when the driver is named) of the plaintiff's insured vehicle C (hereinafter referred to as "the defendant vehicle") at the time of the accident and the situation of the collision between the non-dong viewing distance in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu (hereinafter referred to as "the accident site") at the place around 19:00 on February 15, 2019, the plaintiff vehicle used the two-lane of the viewing company crossing in the two-lane of the three-lane, and the defendant vehicle entered the two-lane crossing, which is not the right side, into the above intersection, and there is no ground for dispute as to the payment of the insurance proceeds for the accident, the plaintiff's repair cost 1,604,000 won, the final payment of self-paid vehicle's own damage charge 200,000 won, the plaintiff vehicle's insurance money No. 1 to 201-371-20

2. Determination

A. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion argues that the accident of this case is caused by the entry into the two lanes to the three-lanes of the road after the right of way by overtaking the defendant vehicle into the vehicle waiting in the right of way in the right of way after the right of way, and by moving the vehicle into the two-lanes of way, not the two-lanes of the right of way in the right of way.

In this regard, the defendant asserts that the defendant's vehicle stops on a two-lane, and inevitably enters the intersection, bypassing from a one-lane, and that the defendant's vehicle that confirmed the vehicle has no vehicle in the intersection at the time of entering the intersection, and that the vehicle is bypassing first, and that the negligence of the plaintiff's vehicle that passed through the intersection by neglecting the duty of the front line, without delay, should also be considered.

B. (1) Determination of the above-mentioned facts as to the ratio of liability, the background leading up to the accident, the conflict, and the shock.

arrow