beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
(a) deliver the third floor of 70.42 square meters among the buildings listed in the attached list;
(b) 1,800,000 won and its corresponding;
Reasons
1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in the statements in Evidence A Nos. 1, 2, and 6, the Plaintiff’s lease deposit amounting to KRW 3 million on March 20, 2018 (hereinafter “instant building”) of KRW 70.42 square meters on the third floor among the buildings listed in the separate sheet to the Defendant on March 20, 2018, with KRW 3 million on deposit, KRW 3.5 million on monthly rent (payment on March 27, 2018), KRW 10,00 per month on water use fee, and period of lease from March 27, 2018 to March 26, 2020. The Defendant’s delayed payment of rent from September 2018 is recognized.
According to the above facts, the above lease contract was lawfully terminated upon the delivery to the defendant of the complaint of this case, which expressed the plaintiff's intention to terminate the above lease contract on the grounds of the delinquency in rent for more than two years.
Therefore, the Defendant shall restore the Plaintiff to its original state: (a) the Defendant shall transfer the instant building to its original state; (b) the monthly rent and the water rate of KRW 1.8 million (i.e., from September 27, 2018 to February 26, 2019) (i.e., from September 27, 2018 to February 26, 2019); and (c) the Defendant shall pay damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from April 11, 2019 to the date of complete payment; and (d) the obligation to pay rent, unjust enrichment, and water rate of KRW 360,00 per month calculated at the rate of KRW 360,000 per month from February 27, 2019 to the completion of delivery of the instant building.
(Plaintiff sought payment of money at the rate of KRW 3.60,00 per month from September 30, 2018 to the completion date of delivery of the building of this case. Of them, the part regarding the period from September 30, 2018 to February 26, 2019 is deemed to overlap with the above paragraph 2). 2. If so, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder is dismissed for lack of justifiable grounds.