1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. The part of the conjunctive claim in the instant lawsuit is dismissed.

3...

1. Basic facts

A. On June 4, 2010, the Plaintiff et al. filed a lawsuit against the Defendant on July 10, 1941 against the Defendant seeking the cancellation of registration of initial ownership in the Defendant’s name and the confirmation that his ownership is owned to five persons other than the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the Plaintiff”).

(hereinafter referred to as the “Lawsuit for Playing”) 1. Namyang-si C river 4,141m2

2. D river of 65 square meters in Namyang-si.

3. E-river 92 square meters in Namyang-si;

4. F-road 2,348 square meters in Namyang-si.

5. G river of 213 square meters in Namyang-si;

6. The land located on one parcel above H 345 square meters in Nam-si, Namyang-si became a land annexed to the annexed Table 1, 2, and the land located on the above 2, 3, and 4 was a land annexed to the annexed Table 5 after the annexation. The land located on the above 5th is as shown in the annexed Table 3, and the land located on the above 6th is as shown in the annexed Table 4.

(B) Since the land which is the object of a prior lawsuit and each land listed in the separate sheet of the object of the lawsuit are identical, the land of this case is not classified below. (b)

The summary of the cause of the prior suit is that the two-party owners, the land before the subdivision of each of the instant lands, i.e., the two-party owners, i., the two-party owners of the land before the subdivision, and that the two-party owners, i.e., the two-party owners of the land before the subdivision, obtained the ownership of each of the instant lands by inheritance, since the title holders and the deceased were the same as the former, the deceased et al., the deceased et al., acquired the ownership of each of the instant lands by inheritance. Since the registration of ownership preservation was completed without any legal cause, the Defendant sought cancellation of the registration of ownership preservation under the name

C. On December 1, 2010, the first instance court of the prior suit filed a lawsuit claiming the cancellation of registration of ownership preservation against the Defendant on the premise of their ownership by 5 other than the Plaintiff, thereby directly accomplishing the purpose of the claim for confirmation.