Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for eight months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the R Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of Q business in accordance with Article 201 of the Jongno-gu Seoul P Building 201, and Defendant B is the representative director of T Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of civil engineering construction business, etc. on the 2nd S in the Jeoncheon-si, Suwon District Court on June 27, 2012, who was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of the imprisonment for six months for fraud and was sentenced to the suspension of the execution on July 5, 2012, and U is the representative director of W Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of removal and waste disposal business,

【2013 Height-26】 The Defendants used the fact that they entrusted the establishment of five projects, such as relocation of graves, to the principal residents association at the Agency for the Construction of the Sejong Multifunctional Administrative City (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul Special Metropolitan City”), and concluded a subcontract construction contract as if they did not have ordered construction works from the Sejong Special Metropolitan City Construction Agency and the original residents association, and conspired with U.S. to acquire money as security deposit for contract execution.

On March 26, 2010, the Defendants issued a false statement to the victim M (the 69-year-old) office at the Y association office in Chungcheongnam-gun X, Chungcheongnam-gun, stating that “The Defendants would give a contract for construction of a set-off and a grave removal work from the Sejong City Construction Agency and the Y association in Sejong-si.” On the face of KRW 100 million, the Defendants would give a contract for construction of a set-off and a grave removal work implemented by the said association. The Corporation will start the construction work within one month.”

However, the Defendants and U.S. attempted to pay street to the partnership of the residents in Sejong-si as the owner of the construction works, and there was no such fact as ordering the relocation of graves, etc., and therefore, they could not proceed with the construction works within one month.

Nevertheless, as seen above, the Defendants conspired with U to deception the victim, and who is affiliated therewith, receive 10 million won from the Korean bank account under the name of the Defendant A as the deposit for performing the contract on March 29, 2010.