logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2015.01.09 2014누5263
이주대책대상자 부적격처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of all the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 20 through 31 (including the pertinent numbers) and the testimony of K witness of the trial of first instance, which are insufficient to recognize the fact that "request No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance" was presented as "request No. 2," and additional evidence submitted at the trial of the court of first instance, and that "the plaintiff has been residing continuously after the moving-in report was completed," which is insufficient to recognize that "the plaintiff has moved in the house of this case and has been actually residing continuously after the moving-in report was completed." Thus,

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow