logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.07.17 2014고단687
사기등
Text

Defendant

A. 1-A. 2-2, 2-2, 500,000 won, and 1-2,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On February 13, 2013, A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution as a crime of occupational embezzlement in Busan District Court's Dong Branch, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on February 21, 2013.

1. Defendant A

A. On April 17, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B at the construction site of the golf practice range located in Suwon-gu, Busan, to the effect that “If the Nggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggging

However, in fact, the defendant's type E was detained in a fraudulent case and was under trial, and the defendant was unable to prepare 88.5 million won as a deposit money for type E, even if he borrowed money from the victim, it was not thought to be used as a deposit money for type E, and the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim because he did not have any property under the name of the defendant due to bad credit standing at the time.

On April 17, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the account in the name of F, the head of the Defendant, under the pretext of borrowing money.

B. (1) On June 201, at a place where the location is unknown, the Defendant transferred the car in the form of BMW528I in the form of KRW 18 million from the person under whose name the Defendant acquired the car in the form of “88k,” which was known at the website of the used car, and without registering the transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant, around August 2013, the Defendant transferred the car in the form of an off-to-date (G) in 2008, which was owned by the persons under whose name the Plaintiff acquired at the “88k’s site,” which was known at the “88k’s website,” and without registering the transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant.

Dor, the Defendant, at the place of February 11, 2013, knew of the above 88k Internet site, at the place where the location is unknown.

arrow