beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in the car of Kaman on the grounds that the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or the injury) and the Road Traffic Act (or the injury).
On June 8, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.272% among blood transfusions on June 23:5, 2017, and led the Defendant to drive the said car under the influence of 0.272%, along with the three-lanes of the six-lanes between the two-lanes of 179 and the two-lanes of the road in front of the 179 Kaak-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul.
In this case, the defendant engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is prohibited from driving a motor vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and there was a duty of care to accurately operate the steering gear and brake system of the motor vehicle and to safely drive the steering system of the motor vehicle and to prevent accidents by safely driving it.
Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in performing duties due to negligence in the course of driving in a state where normal driving is difficult under the influence of alcohol, and failure to properly operate the steering gear and operation of the steering gear, and the Defendant was driving by the victim D(60) of the said vehicle operated by the Defendant, which was under the influence of traffic signal in front of the left side of the said vehicle for the said Kank-in driver’s vehicle, and did not take necessary measures, such as rescueing the victim D, for approximately two weeks of medical treatment. The Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim FF (36 years of age) who was seated in the said 5 si in need of medical treatment for about three weeks, while having 3,923,742 won repair costs of the said 5 si, even if she immediately stops in the same direction, and did not take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the said victim D by destroying it.
2. On June 9, 2017, the Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) is drunk with 00:45 on June 9, 201, alcohol concentration 0.272%.