1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a person who received medical treatment at the “D Hospital” located in Busan Northern-gu (hereinafter “instant hospital”); Defendant B is the doctor of the instant hospital; Defendant C is the operator of the instant hospital.

On July 4, 2012, the Plaintiff received a pregnancy diagnosis from the Plaintiff as a member of the instant hospital, and received a periodical pre-treatment thereafter.

On March 18, 2013, Defendant B had to give birth to the Plaintiff through the king-Wang-man in a balanced manner.

On March 25, 2013, the Plaintiff gave birth to E by the instant hospital through the king operation (hereinafter “instant operation”).

After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff complained of the pain part of the bones, and on March 28, 2013, the medical personnel of the instant hospital inspected the Plaintiff’s photographing, and as a result, observed the frame of the bones No. 9 at the right side.

On April 1, 2013, the Plaintiff was discharged from the instant hospital.

On April 8, 2013, the Plaintiff visited F Hospital and received medical treatment at the F Hospital No. 8 and 9.

The Plaintiff received treatment by Defendant B from Defendant B on June 11, 2013 through the diagnosis of a scarcity’s scarcity disease, and received treatment on August 27, 2013 through the diagnosis of a scarcity’s external food and an interpellation.

On November 15, 2013, Nov. 18, 2013, Nov. 18, 2013, and Nov. 27, 2013, the Plaintiff received treatment from Defendant B through the diagnosis of a scarinary disease in the scarb.

On June 26, 2014, July 9, 2014, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from Defendant B through the diagnosis of the quality and the outer malodye, the malty maltyodosis, the maltyod maltye disease in the womb, the external malodye, and the malodalty and the malodya.

On October 31, 2014, the Plaintiff had a pregnancy response through the pregnancy test, and had the examination and treatment of each of the above diseases and the quality test of pregnancy conducted by Defendant B. On November 7, 2014, the Plaintiff was under the pre-explosion test by Defendant B, again under the pre-explosion test from Defendant B, and was under the pre-explosion test on November 7, 2014.