Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 26,876,822 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 2,500,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) each of them from May 20, 2013 to December 19, 2014.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. At around 14:30 on May 20, 2013, Plaintiff A, who was sent at the intersection in front of the Seo-dong Library Seo-dong, Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-dong, Seo-dong, Seoul-dong, to turn to the left, was facing the back of the above Orala car (hereinafter referred to as “Amsta car”) and the right bridge on the left front part of the Dstuna car driven by C during the signal at one-lane.
(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case").
In the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered bodily injury, such as a ductal pelvise, etc., without the right side, and was hospitalized until August 31, 2013.
C. Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to a harming vehicle.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8 (including a provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the factual basis as seen earlier prior to the occurrence of liability for damages, the instant accident is determined to have occurred due to the negligence of the driver of a sea-going vehicle in violation of the duty to keep the driver from driving the sea-going vehicle. Therefore, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by
3. A period for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall, in principle, be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than a month shall be included in the side on which the appraised value is less than a month, and less than a won and less than a last month shall be discarded, and the present price shall be calculated at the time of the accident of the amount of damages by the simple discount method which deducts intermediary interest at the rate of 5/12 per month
In addition, if the numerical value of heading exceeds 240, the number of heading in order to prevent excessive compensation is limited to 240.
In addition, a party’s assertion that is not mentioned separately shall be rejected.
Plaintiff
A’s basic matters: Gender, E date of birth, age 48 and 13 months at the time of the accident, and life expectancy 31.62 on October 6, 1989, Plaintiff A entered a F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) and worked in the power department, while serving in the power department.