1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In light of the fact that the Plaintiff is merely a subordinate public official who receives instructions from other public officials in this court, the Plaintiff asserts that all the acts listed in the grounds for disciplinary action Nos. 1 and 2 are conducted in accordance with instructions such as D, which are public officials, and that the disposal of damaged postal items (red red ginseng) did not follow the instructions of public officials in the administrative office, and that the act of entry in the grounds for disciplinary action No. 4 should be considered to have been done without permission as stated in the grounds for disciplinary action No. 3. G et al.

However, even if all evidence and materials submitted by the first instance court and this court are examined, the fact-finding and decision of the first instance court that rejected the plaintiff's assertion is justifiable.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.