The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two years of imprisonment, eight-hours of imprisonment, and eight-hours of sexual assault treatment programs) is too unreasonable.

2. The following should be considered in light of the fact that the defendant denied the crime of this case in an investigative agency, but actually supported by the defendant's mother, such as that the defendant's mistake was recognized from the original trial to the trial trial, and there was no criminal penalty exceeding the fine, and that the defendant's mother lives as a basic livelihood recipient after the divorce, and the defendant actually supported the defendant's mother's mother.

On the other hand, the Defendant’s crime of this case committed sexual intercourse with the victim (the victim (the victim of 15 years of age and female her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her female her her her female her her her her her her her her her her female her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

In light of the above various circumstances, there is no change in special circumstances that could vary in the sentence of the court below. In addition, in full view of the following conditions: Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive or circumstance of crime, motive or circumstance of crime, method and method of crime, contents and result of crime, and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Supreme Court sentencing committee, the sentence imposed by the court below against Defendant is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3...