logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.09.14 2016가합10113
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 117,259,245 to the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from February 12, 2016 to September 14, 2017.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. Plaintiff’s assertion 1) On April 9, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for new construction of housing B with the Defendant and Jeju-si, and set the construction cost at KRW 160 million. After which, at the Defendant’s request during the process of new construction of housing, the contract for new construction of housing was concluded verbally at the Defendant’s request, and the construction cost was set at KRW 160 million, as in the new construction of housing (the sum of the contract for new construction of housing and the contract for new construction of housing, the sum of the contract for new construction of housing and the contract for new construction of housing is referred to as “instant contract

2) The Plaintiff had changed the location, structure, etc. of a house and a shop in the process of constructing a new house and a string house in 2,365,00 CCTV construction work 860,00 CCTV construction work and outside lighting construction work 5,170,000 and 19,500,000,000 column 19,500:3,267,000 store finish work 29,000 outer space 29,584,000 fence installation work in 28,490,000 fence installation work, 58,028,200,200 fence installation work at the Defendant’s request, and the Plaintiff did not include the instant construction work in the instant contract.

The details and expenses of the additional construction works conducted by the Plaintiff are as follows:

3) However, since the construction cost of KRW 100 million paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff and KRW 39,859,589,589 shall be deducted, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the construction cost of KRW 238,168,611 (total construction cost of KRW 378,028,200, KRW 1000, KRW 39,859,589), and damages for delay thereof. (B) Determination 1) The Plaintiff and the Defendant set the construction cost of the gold contract of this case as KRW 160,000,000 for new housing construction cost of KRW 160,00 is not disputed between the parties.

On the other hand, the defendant set the amount of 110 million won for the new construction of the string house.

arrow