Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 29, 2014, the Defendant committed the crime of July 29, 2014, committed the act of purchasing the sex of a juvenile by promising that “I will give 150,000 won in return for sexual intercourse,” from among D hotel 301 in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, to conduct a radiophone display to e (n.e., 15 years of age).” The Defendant provided that “I will give 150,000 won in return for sexual intercourse and paid 150,000 won in return.”

2. On August 4, 2014, around 22:00 on August 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) contacted the said E with the F apartment 102 and 503, Dongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul; (b) induced the said E to the said place; and (c) paid KRW 150,000 to the said place one time after having sexual intercourse; and (d) provided the same in return for purchasing the sex of the juvenile.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first trial record (the fact that he/she has made a sex relationship with E at each date, time, and place on the market and gave 150,000 won in return);

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A criminal investigation report (attaching the details of dispatch);

1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel in the current face and telegraph of E

1. The summary of the argument showed that E was 20 years of age in the Stockholm, as well as that he was 20 years of age in appearance, and the Defendant was unaware of the fact that E was a juvenile under the age of 19 at the time of each of the instant crimes.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of this case, it is reasonable to view that the Defendant was aware of, or was aware of, the fact that the Defendant was a juvenile under the age of 19 at the time of committing each of the instant crimes. Absently, it is reasonable to deem that

E made a statement in this court that “A defendant was 20 years of age when he was faced with, but did not have been believed to have been able to have been able to present his age even as he was believed to have been able to have been lost. After the first sex relationship, E stated that the defendant was 16 years of age.”

(b)the accurate time and place where E refers to the actual age;