logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.05.04 2016고정437
모욕
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 22, 2013, around 18:16, the Defendant visited the Defendant’s home located in Daegu Dong-gu C, 113 Dong-dong, 503, to the clinic of “E” at the Internet website, and was accused of a complaint from the Victim G by defamation.

The phrase " shall be written in writing to the effect that the phrase " shall be written," and " shall be written."

1.1 Dobbk, where such a matter does not seem to exist.

쇠지도요

형님! 이 벌레 같은 놈! 나도 고 소해 라!!!’ 라는 댓 글을 게시하여, 피해자를 공연히 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Copy of the statement made to G by the police;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the complaint filed by G (in cases of two books of investigation record, two books of investigation record, two pages, not more than 23 pages) and a copy of each Internet news photograph;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine of 300,000 won for which the sentence is suspended; and

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (with no previous conviction against the defendant and considering various circumstances, such as the circumstances before and after the crime)

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant prepared comments on the same content as the facts charged, but it is only the Defendant’s statement on the victim’s complaint of “F”, who is the Defendant’s seat, using a normally named expression for the Vietnamese members for a daily meaning. As such, the Defendant did not have any intent to insult the victim.

The argument is asserted.

2. In other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment, i.e., (i) the Defendant posted a statement that F was accused of a complaint from the injured party; (ii) the Defendant written the instant comments on this case; and (iii) the instant comments on F’s writing and the instant comments, which are referred in the comments on the instant comments, filed a complaint with F.

arrow