1. Donadona, Defendant Incorporated Incorporated Company:

A. 8,883,452 Won and 54.2 of the Plaintiff (Appointed Party)

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Appointor B (hereinafter “Appointed”) invested the two capital stock with the Defendants, and the Defendants entered into an investment contract with the Plaintiff with the content that the Plaintiff and the Appointor would pay the investment principal and profit upon raising the two capital with the said capital stock.

However, the profit was paid in installments until 12 months from the date of investment, and the investment principal was agreed to be paid when 14 months from the date of investment.

(hereinafter “instant investment contract”). (b)

The details of the instant investment contract are as follows: (i) the Plaintiff claimed 6,6960,00 won for 20.3.28 March 28, 2013; (ii) the Plaintiff received 6,096 principal of the investment principal as of the date of concluding the contract (14 months) from the Defendants on the date of concluding the contract; (iii) the Plaintiff’s Do Co., Ltd. or Do Co., Ltd; (iv) 0.48,00,000,000 60,960,000 on 20.38,000,000 from March 28, 2013 to May 27, 2014; and (iv) the Plaintiff’s 203,000,000 won for 20,000 won for 30,000,000 won for 20,000 won for 20,3630,730,637,5,20136,

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts of confessions, Gap evidence No. 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the facts of recognition 1 as to the existence of the investment principal and the obligation to pay profits, the Defendants had already been on the aggregate of the investment principal and profits under the instant investment contract to the Plaintiffs.