Text
Defendant
B shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won.
Defendant
B If the above fine is not paid, 100.
Reasons
Criminal facts
Defendant
B around 20:00 on October 3, 2013, at F convenience points located in E in Jeonju City, on the ground that the victim A, who purchased an electronic scam for physical use, was influenced, the two hand floor of the Defendant’s scams, once in each time, and the victim was pushed down on the display scam, and the victim was pushed down to the display scam, making it difficult for the victim to keep the scam, so far as he was pushed down, the victim scambling for about 8 weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;
1. A report on the occurrence of a crime, a criminal investigation report, and evidential materials attached thereto;
1. Application of CCTV image data USB, diagnosis certificate, medical opinion, medical records, details of medical care benefits, and Acts and subordinate statutes governing medical expenses calculation;
1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257(1) of the choice of punishment, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine (the circumstances favorable to the defendant B, including the fact that the defendant B led to confession of the crime in this case and reflect
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act
1. The summary of the facts charged against Defendant A at F convenience points located in Jeonju City, around October 3, 2013, around 20:00, Defendant A assaulted the victim at one time on the two hand floor of the victim on the ground that the victim was able to see the soundness suitable for the victim B by purchasing the electronic scambling for sports at the F convenience points located in Jeonju City, but the victim was able to see the scambling in the visual room.
2. The instant facts charged against Defendant A are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim B withdraws his/her wish to punish Defendant A on August 21, 2014, which was after the prosecution of this case.