A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On January 10, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 4 months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court on January 10, 2008, and was released on October 28, 2008 from Daegu Detention House as parole and completed the execution of the sentence on November 24, 2008.

On October 28, 2008, immediately after the Defendant was released from parole on December 2008, 2008, the Defendant: (a) established SA by using a large number of business employees without any specific project implementation plan or project feasibility review; and (b) promised to guarantee the principal and interest every year for real estate development investment with a fixed interest of 20-80% from many and unspecified people; and (c) sought real estate development projects that cover the project fund.

According to the above indemnity, the Defendant, at the Daegu-gu Office T 302 around that time, established S, controlled the entire business as the representative director, and employed business employees, and proceeded with the development project of WW general industrial complex from around December 2009, and the development project of WW general industrial complex from around April 2010, and the investigation was conducted from around September 201 to around October 201 on suspicion of violating the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business, while criminal punishment was imposed on around October 201.

The Defendant, around November 2009, at the above Spo Port Office located in the nearest area of the Pohang-si in the North Korean Port, lent money to the victim DE (59 years of age) for W Development Project, and after the 8 month period, guaranteed the principal and paid interest at the rate of 40% per annum.

The phrase “the meaning was false.”

However, the defendant has failed to prepare a specific realization plan such as PF loans and approval for a project, and a large amount of financing plan. ② The defendant has already failed to pay the principal and interest as agreed even if the project is successful due to the burden of the large amount of existing investment principal and high interest, and ③ the project is in progress.