logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.12.24 2020나60673
손해배상(기)
Text

Among the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid under the order shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, on the ground that the court citing this case is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for

The following shall be added to the second fifteenth day of the judgment of the first instance:

Until December 28, 2017, the hospital that received the diagnosis “as follows,” by December 28, 2017, the first instance court Decision No. 1, No. 1, No. 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

The fourth to fifth of the first instance judgment shall be followed by the following:

【A) The Plaintiff sought reimbursement of KRW 1,861,280 in total from the instant injury. Thus, according to the health team and evidence No. 4 (including the paper number) with respect to the medical expenses spent by the Plaintiff for the instant injury, the Plaintiff is deemed to have spent KRW 1,861,280 in total for about one year and two months from December 4, 2017 to January 23, 2019, which is the date of the instant injury. However, considering the aforementioned evidence and evidence No. 2 and evidence No. 3 as well as the overall purport of the arguments, it is difficult to view the Plaintiff as having received intensive treatment for 6 months from the date of discharge from the hospital on December 28, 2017, the Plaintiff was unable to be deemed to have received medical expenses for 1,861,280 won from the disease of the instant case, and in particular, it is difficult to view the Plaintiff as having received the symptoms of 20.3 years from the disease of 2018.

arrow