logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019. 06. 20. 선고 2018나91339 판결
송금착오로 이체된 금원에 대한 강제집행의 불허를 구할 수 없음[국승]
Title

No petition may be filed for non-performance of compulsory execution against the money transferred by mistake of remittance

Summary

In the case of an erroneous transfer, the remitter has the right to claim the return of unjust enrichment against the payee, and it is not possible to request the creditor of the payee to refuse the compulsory execution against the deposit claim made by the payee.

Related statutes

Article 741 of the Civil Act: Contents of Unjust Enrichment

Cases

Suwon District Court 2018Na91339 Demurrer against distribution

Plaintiff

Co., Ltd. 000

Defendant

Korea

Conclusion of Pleadings

on October 30, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

on January 20, 2019

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's explanation on this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil

2. Conclusion

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed.

As above, the plaintiff's appeal is justified as it is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow