The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for one year and the return of victims) that the court below sentenced against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is divided and reflected in the judgment, each of the crimes of this case has been committed, in light of the law, frequency, frequency, frequency, etc., the crime was committed, and the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, in particular, on September 6, 2012, the court was sentenced to the probation of one year and six months for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes due to the crime similar to the larceny of this case, and was sentenced to two years in the probation of one year and six months, and did not know of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and did not reach an agreement with the victims until the trial. In addition, considering the motive and background leading up to each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's age, character, and environment after the crime was committed, the judgment of the court below is too inappropriate, and the above assertion of the defendant is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.