A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who works as a delivery center.

1. 업무방해 피고인은 2015. 1. 14. 05:40경 ~ 05:55경 제주시 B에 있는 피해자 C(50세) 운영의 D편의점 내에서 피고인이 찾는 담배가 없자 도시락을 카운터에 툭 던지면서 피해자에게 시비를 걸고 욕설을 하며, 90도 각도로 사과를 하라고 요구하는 등 소란을 피워 위력으로 약 10여분 가량 편의점 업무를 방해하였다.

2. At around 05:55 on January 14, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of public order and security of F, by going back from Jeju Western Police Station E District Police Station E District guard F, and patrolman G, who was called to go home from the Defendant after receiving a report on the disturbance as above at the above D point.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement prepared by C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of On-Site photographs);

1. Relevant statutory provisions and the choice of punishment for the crime: Articles 136 (1) and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Taking into account the factors of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that there is no particular criminal record outside of punishment of a fine imposed once, motive and circumstances leading to the crime, circumstances after the crime, occupation, age, family relationship,

1. Order of community service: It shall be judged as ordered for the reason under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;