1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

However, as set forth in the following paragraph 2, part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is written, and the judgment as set forth in the following paragraph 3 is added to the argument that the plaintiff emphasizes again.

2. The string of the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance shall consist of “stock company D” in the 2th half of the judgment of the court of first instance as “H” and shall be stated as “stock company H.”

The second "Defendant", the second "Defendant", the fifth "Defendant", the fifth "Defendant", the second "Defendant", the fifth "Defendant", the fifth "Defendant", the fifth "Defendant" and the second "Defendant" of the fifth "Y" shall be changed into "D".

3. Determination of the attached articles

A. Defendant’s assertion 1) rather than concluding the instant service contract with the Plaintiff regarding market research and marketing activities related to design services, the Defendant prepared the instant service contract in the form of so-called “refinites” in the form of so-called “refinites.” Even if the validity of the instant service contract is recognized, the parties to the payment of the service fees are not the Plaintiff, E, but the Defendant entered into the instant service contract with the Plaintiff upon entering into the first design service contract with D, and allowing D to enter into the instant service contract with the Plaintiff at the time of entering into the instant service contract with the K non-real estate trust and the second design service contract with the Defendant, using the following points: “The Defendant forced the other party to enter into the instant service contract by presenting unfair disadvantage, such as unfair conditions, in light of the ordinary service practices, etc., to make a transaction with himself or its business operator designated by him or the other party” or “the act of having any disadvantage in the process of setting or altering the terms and conditions of transaction or giving any disadvantage to the other party in the course of its implementation.”