1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff is a person who has operated a private taxi using C vehicle.

B. On September 5, 2006, at the office of the E company located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Plaintiff sold to the Defendant a license for private taxi and private taxi transport business in KRW 80,000.

C. At the time of sale, the Defendant made payment of KRW 60,000,000 in cash on behalf of the owner of the automobile by transferring documents for the transfer of ownership of the automobile. D. The Defendant made payment of KRW 20,000 in cash.

The defendant paid 16,00,000 won to the plaintiff on the day of sale on behalf of the defendant.

As the Defendant did not pay 60,000,000 won on behalf of the Defendant, the Plaintiff urged the Defendant to pay the amount of KRW 10,000 to the Defendant, and the Defendant paid KRW 10,000 to the Defendant in cash.

E. After the sale, the Defendant paid KRW 18,500,000 to the Plaintiff’s new bank account.

Won 1,000,000 on September 14, 2006, KRW 2,000 on September 14, 2006, KRW 1,000,000 on September 14, 2006, KRW 200 on September 25, 2006, KRW 4,000 on September 25, 2006, KRW 500,000 on October 17, 2006

F. The defendant paid a total of KRW 44,500,000 out of KRW 80,000 for a license for private taxi and transport business, and did not pay the remainder of KRW 35,500,000.

G. Therefore, the defendant is liable to pay to the plaintiff the above 44,500,000 won and damages for delay.

2. The fact that the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to sell in KRW 80,000,00 the sales price for a private taxi and private taxi transport business license between the Plaintiff and the Defendant can be acknowledged by the entry of the evidence No. 2.

According to Gap evidence No. 2, not only private taxi transportation business license but also private taxi vehicles are subject to sales.

The defendant's assertion against this is not accepted.

However, comprehensively taking account of the whole purport of the arguments in Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 6 and 8 (Evidence No. 3-1, Eul evidence No. 4-1, 2, Eul evidence No. 6, and Eul evidence No. 8 are recognized as a result of each written appraisal).