logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.11.14 2018재구합106
포상금지급청구 등
Text

1. The lawsuit against the Defendants shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of litigation incurred between the Plaintiff and the Defendants are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Where the court deems it necessary to provide security for the costs of lawsuit, such as when a claim is groundless based on the written complaint, briefs and other records of trial, it may order the plaintiff to provide security for the costs of lawsuit ex officio, and when the plaintiff fails to provide security within the period for providing security, it may dismiss the lawsuit by judgment without holding any pleadings.

(2) Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, Article 117(2) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act, and the main text of Article 124 of the Civil Procedure Act). Meanwhile, even where a motion for challenge is filed, the

(2) Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, proviso of Article 48 of the Civil Procedure Act). On May 27, 2019, this court ordered the Plaintiff to offer lawsuit security against each of the Defendant as security for the litigation costs of this case within 15 days from the date of receiving the notice of this decision. The Plaintiff’s appeal against this order is dismissed, and the Plaintiff’s reappeal is withdrawn (Supreme Court Decision 2019No762 Decided August 27, 2019) (see Supreme Court Decision 2019Da762). The fact that the Plaintiff did not offer a security for the lawsuit costs against the Defendants is apparent in the record.

Therefore, pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, the main text of Article 124 of the Civil Procedure Act, and Article 200 of the Civil Procedure Act, the part of the lawsuit in this case against the defendants shall

arrow