A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On December 24, 2010, the Defendant stated that “F”, “F”, “value”, “F million won”, “F4 December 24, 2010”, “B4 February 2011”, “G”, and “G” in the issuer’s column in the name of “G”, for the purpose of exercising the right, at the law firm E office located in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul. (701).

A promissory note in the name of G, which is a security, has been forged by sealing the seal of G, and a forged promissory note was delivered to the creditor F of the defendant, who is unaware of such fact on that page, as if it was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to G;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the notarial sentiments, recording notes, and investigation reports (referring to the filing of objections to a claim and the submission of loan litigation records);

1. Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the fact of Article 241 of the Criminal Act) and Articles 217 and 214(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact of exercising forged securities);

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act, as the punishment for concurrent crimes;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the basic area (six months to two years) (the forgery, alteration and exercise of securities) of the kind, such as securities, etc.;

2. The defendant's act of forging a promissory note by the defendant's act of forging a promissory note does not cause damage not only to his name, but also to F, who is the addressee of a promissory note, thereby undermining the credibility and safety of the legal transaction of securities with respect to the payment of oil. The case is that G, the defendant's father, is recognized as a forged person and thus, is difficult for F, the creditor of F, to recover his claim because it is difficult for F, who is the creditor of F, due to its civil liability. The defendant's confession of the crime of this case is against the defendant, and G, the person who is the mother, wants the wife of