A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Criminal facts

On March 19, 2004, the defendant and the respondent of the treatment order (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") were sentenced to a fine of three million won for a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection, etc. of Victims (In a concentrated place) at the Suwon Gywon Gywon Gywon Gywon Gywon Gywon(hereinafter referred to as "the defendant"), and was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection, etc. of Victims Thereof (In a concentrated place) on September 22, 2006. The defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (In a concentrated place) at Kywon Gywon Gywon Gywon Gywon Gywon Gywon Gywon Gywon Gywon Gyon(in a concentrated place), and the defendant was sentenced to a fine of six million won for an indecent act in his prison on March 27, 2014>

[2] On December 11, 2015, the Defendant was boarding and leaving D buses at the bus stops located in Ansan-si around 18:39 on December 11, 2015, and when the bus became in the vicinity of a white distance, the Defendant: (a) left behind the victim E (here, 32 years old) who used the boom mixed booming booming boom in the bus to the right side of the victim’s body; (b) pushed the Defendant’s booming the Defendant’s vessel and sexual part into the victim’s body; and (c) flicked the victim’s booming around 33 years old at the F market stops; and (d) continuously, when the bus became at the F market stops, the Defendant tried to stop the above victim’s walk to the right side of the victim’s breast, as the victim’s left side was frightd by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act on the victims of the bus in a public means of transportation.

[Judgment of the court below] Defendant 1 did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to treatment order.