beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and for ten months, for each of the defendants B.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant A, “The 2016 Highest 1185,” committed an act as if the victims or their families were to be employed by the said company in spite of their intention or ability to employ them to H, and received money in return for such act and received money.
1. Around April 2014, the victim D made a false statement to the effect that “A victim D is a person in charge of the internal personnel management of H” through I and the Defendant’s funeral B, etc., in the “JE Office” of the operation of the I in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., and that “A victim would have the victim’s children employed in H, on the face of the State.”
However, even if the Defendant received money from the victim as above, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to have the victims employed H.
Accordingly, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby, up to five million won from the victim on April 28, 2014 to the bank account in the name of Gyeongnam bank account under the I on April 28, 2014;
5. A person who received a remittance of KRW 25 million in total on two occasions, such as the remittance of KRW 25 million to the accounts of community credit cooperatives under B;
2. On December 3, 2014, the Defendant was transferred KRW 10 million from the victim E to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant on December 5, 2014, to the victim E by means of the aforementioned method, stating that he/she would have employed the victim E in “H (H),” and that he/she received KRW 10 million from the victim.
3. On or around December 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the Victim G, “B” in front of the L guard room located in Ulsan-gu K, Ulsan-gu; (b) received KRW 15 million from the victim G to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of the said Defendant on the same day.
Defendant A made a false statement to the victim through the Victim F’s F-friendly M, who is the victim F-born F, that “The victim’s children will be employed by (i) the victim’s children at home, and (ii) the Defendant A will be employed by (ii) H’s subordinate businesses.”
However, the facts are.