The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment defendant is against the crime of this case and there is no record of criminal punishment of the same crime and suspension of qualification or more severe punishment.

However, the crime of this case is not likely to be committed by concealing property by transferring the existing bonds and customers, etc. of the company they operated under their mother’s name to a new company established under the mother’s name for the purpose of evading compulsory execution under the circumstances where the defendant bears a debt of 45 million won or more to E.

In addition, even though considerable time has passed after the crime of this case, damage recovery or debt repayment has not yet been made.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and pleadings do not seem to be unfair because the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.