1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 16, 2014 through July 16, 2015, between the subjects and location of a national class member’s housing construction project performed by the insured, the Plaintiff Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “the head industry”) for the head industry (hereinafter referred to as the “head industry”) as a security for user’s compensation liability, and as a security for user’s compensation liability (10 million won per person per 100 million won/100 per accident) during the construction project performed by the insured of a national class member, the Plaintiff is the head industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “head industry”).

(2) The Defendant is the owner of a B Kacke-type vehicle belonging to the East Transport Co., Ltd. (hereinafter the Defendant’s vehicle).

B. At around 14:10 on January 19, 2015, the main industry leased the Defendant’s vehicle from the Defendant to load the beam line at the south-gu port where the main industry is being constructed, and at the site of “E Corporation” in D. The Defendant’s driver was F. 2) at the time, the employees belonging to the main industry engaged in the removal of the H beam line attached to the wall at the construction site of the instant case by linking the Defendant’s vehicle with the air. However, the Defendant’s employees at the time used to remove the H beam line attached to the wall at the construction site of the instant case. However, the Defendant’s employees visited the H beam line at the temporary moving path, who was in the temporary moving path, was released by the Defendant with the Defendant’s landing of the said facility, and accordingly, the H beam, which was fixed in the course of fishing, was shocked by the Defendant’s employees belonging to the main industry at the next direction.

(3) In the instant accident, G suffered from the injury of “the complete cutting of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the case,” and received treatment such as “the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the case,” but even after treatment, the part of the part of the part of the case remains 34.75% of the work ability and remaining 34.75% of the work ability. (C) The part of the Plaintiff’s insurance payment for the funeral industry is the G employer, and the future treatment cost incurred by G due to the instant accident.