logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2020.09.10 2020노103
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(위계등추행)
Text

Defendant

All appeals filed by A and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

A. Defendant A1) In fact-finding Defendant 1 did not commit an indecent act in a manner that damages the victim D’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her his her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

3) According to the lower court’s sentencing on the Defendant of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable. (B) In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal doctrine, etc., and thereby acquitted the Defendant A of each of the charges on the part of the Defendants, who committed an indecent act by force against the victim D, or Defendant B with respect to the victim L, even though it could sufficiently recognize the fact that Defendant C committed emotional abuse against the victim D, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the act of emotional abuse, etc.

2. The lower court’s sentencing on Defendant A is too unjustifiable and unfair.

2. As to Defendant A’s assertion of mistake and misapprehension of legal principles

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, the lower court also argued to the same effect as the allegation in the grounds for appeal, and the lower court, comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted by the evidence, rejected the Defendant’s assertion and convicted the Defendant of this part of the charges on the grounds that the Defendant committed an indecent act in light of the victim D’s her butt will, and thus, found the Defendant guilty of this part of the charges. ① The victim testified in the lower court to the following purport: (a) on November 2017, 2017, the Defendant testified at the place where the Defendant was placed in his/her hand at the store, and there is a school rule that the Defendant’s her and her and her relative (H’s indoorization is reported).

arrow